OOPS Assessment 4

Assessment 4: Game Development

Dragon 21

During the ITS OOPS project participants will work in groups to develop a game using KNP and keep a log book of their process during the project.

The nature of participants game is entirely up to them, however students should be encouraged to try to choose something they can finish. Some marks will be allocated for the level of completion, as this indicates their competency in Top Down Design. However, this is and exploratory work and students should not fail just because their work is incomplete.

The log book kept by participants should detail their planning, any problems they faced and any solutions they found. It should also detail each participants roles in production.

The project should be assessed both on the basis of innovation, extent and standard of completion. This will be assessed by evaluating finished products. Students should also receive marks on the basis of the level of detail recorded about their development process. This will be assessed through review of their log books.

Project	VHA	HA	SA	LA	VLA
Project	Very well designed project showing excellent ability to conceptualise design issues, excellent appreciation of project time constraints, a high level of knowledge of group skill levels, excellent understanding of technical issues and demonstrating excellent and innovative design.	Well designed project showing good ability to conceptualise design issues. good appreciation of project time constraints, sound appreciation of group skill levels, good understanding of technical issues and demonstrating innovative design.	Effectively designed project showing reasonable ability to conceptualise design issues, reasonable appreciation of time constraints, general appreciation of group skill levels, reasonable understanding of technical issues and demonstrating good design..	Simply designed project demonstrating basic ability to conceptualise design issues, basic appreciation of time constraints, some appreciation of group skill levels, some understanding of technical issues and demonstrating reasonable design.	Poorly designed project demonstrating little ability to conceptualise design issues, inadequate appreciation of time constraints, almost no appreciation of group skill levels, and lack of evidence of understanding of technical issues and demonstrating poor design.
Report	Very well designed project report showing excellent ability to conceptualise game design, a high level of schematic planning, excellent understanding of design issues.	Well designed project report showing good ability to conceptualise game design, sound appreciation of schematic planning, good understanding of design issues.	Effectively designed project report showing reasonable ability to conceptualise game design, general appreciation of schematic planning, reasonable understanding of design issues.	Simply designed project report demonstrating basic ability to conceptualise game design, some appreciation of schematic planning, some understanding of design issues.	Poorly designed project report demonstrating little ability to conceptualise game design, almost no appreciation of schematic planning, and lack of evidence of understanding of design issues. issues.
Overall Project and Report	Very well designed project showing excellent quality in design and presentation, demonstrating high quality schematic concepts, innovative design and excellent graphic use. Excellent Project Report with well above average schematic explanations, high quality grammar and spelling and excellent presentation.	Well designed project showing very good quality in design and presentation, sound schematic concepts, very good design and graphic use. Very good Project Report with above average schematic explanations, good quality grammar and spelling and very good presentation.	Effectively designed project showing good quality in design and presentation, thoughtful schematic concepts, good design and graphic use Good Project Report with reasonable schematic explanations, careful grammar and spelling and good presentation.	Simply designed project demonstrating basic ability in design and presentation, some appreciation of schematic concepts, adequate design and graphic use Simple Project Report with some schematic explanations, limited quality in grammar and spelling and reasonable presentation.	Poorly designed project demonstrating little ability in design and presentation, almost no schematic planning, poor design and ineffective graphic use. Poor Project Report with very few schematic explanations, poor quality grammar and spelling and poor presentation.